The Hindu Editorial Summary

Editorial Topic : Bridging the Rural Mobile Connectivity Gap in India

 GS-3 Mains Exam : Economy

Revision Notes

The Problem:

  • Urban-rural digital divide: 127% urban vs 58% rural tele-density (latest TRAI data).
  • Lower income in rural areas makes mobile services less affordable.
  • Rural characteristics hinder infrastructure deployment:
    • Low population density
    • Population clusters separated by vast spaces
    • Remoteness (e.g., Himalayan villages)
  • Existing cellular networks (like 5G) prioritize urban needs (high data rates, low latency).
  • Limited research on solutions for rural connectivity challenges.

Mobile Connectivity Needs:

  • Mobile devices are essential for communication, financial transactions (UPI), and internet access.

Cellular Networks Explained:

  • Network equipment provides wireless connectivity via base stations and towers.
  • Cellular networks consist of two sub-networks:
    • Access Network (AN): Base stations provide coverage in a limited area.
    • Core Network (CN): Enables connections to other networks (like the internet).
  • Data travels through both the base station and CN to reach its destination.

Why Rural Connectivity Matters:

  • Rural populations deserve equal access to communication and digital services.
  • Improved connectivity can:
    • Bridge the digital divide.
    • Boost rural economies.
    • Enhance access to education and healthcare.

Affordable Rural Broadband: IEEE 2061-2024 Standard

Focus: Affordable broadband access in rural areas.

Key Features:

  • Heterogeneous Access Network (AN):
    • Macro-BS (large coverage area, cellular technology)
    • Wi-Fi (small coverage area, high speed)
    • Integrated AN control for seamless handoff between Wi-Fi and macro-BS.
  • Multi-hop wireless middle-mile network:
    • Cost-effective alternative to optical fiber for long distances.
    • Uses technologies like satellites or long-range Wi-Fi.
  • CN Bypass:
    • Allows communication between nearby users directly within AN, bypassing the core network (CN).
    • Reduces latency and potentially avoids CN congestion.


  • Affordable rural connectivity.
  • Scalable future mobile network architecture.

Developed by: Prof. Karandikar’s lab at IIT Bombay.

Comparison with 5G:

  • 5G AN: Homogeneous (similar base stations)
  • IEEE-2061 AN: Heterogeneous (macro-BS + Wi-Fi)

Additional Notes:

  • This is the second IEEE standard developed by Prof. Karandikar’s lab.
  • Widespread adoption can bridge the rural-urban digital divide.




The Hindu Editorial Summary

Editorial Topic : The Challenge of Generative AI (GAI)

 GS-3 Mains Exam : Science and Technology

Revision Notes


Challenge: Existing legal frameworks struggle to govern rapidly evolving GAI technology.

What is GAI?

  • A type of AI that generates new content (images, text, music, videos) based on existing data.
  • Used in art creation, drug discovery, and chatbots.


  • Safe harbour and Liability:
    • Legal debate on classifying GAI tools (intermediary, conduit, creator) for liability.
    • Unclear application of “safe harbour” protection (Shreya Singhal judgment).
    • Chatbot liability arises from user-reposting, not just response generation.
  • Copyright Conundrum:
    • No copyright protection for AI-generated works (global issue).
    • Unclear who is liable for copyright infringement by GAI tools.
    • Difficulty assigning liability due to GAI tool classification.
  • Privacy Concerns:
    • GAI models trained on datasets raise privacy concerns beyond data collection.
    • “Right to erasure” and “right to be forgotten” challenged by GAI’s data retention.

Steps Forward:

  • Learning by Doing:
    • Grant GAI platforms temporary immunity (sandbox approach) to gather data and inform future regulations.
  • Data Rights and Responsibilities:
    • Revamp data acquisition for GAI training (revenue-sharing, licensing agreements with data owners).
  • Licensing Challenges:
    • Develop centralized data licensing platforms for GAI training (similar to Getty Images).


  • A comprehensive reevaluation of digital jurisprudence is needed to address GAI challenges.
  • A collaborative government approach and judicial interpretations are crucial to harness GAI benefits while protecting individual rights.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *