Blueprint for Safeguarding Children

Context: A recent Supreme Court ruling redefines the viewing and downloading of child pornography as a serious crime, rather than an adult indulgence.

 

Supreme Court Judgment on Child Exploitation

  • Madras High Court Ruling (Jan 2024): Initially ruled that merely downloading/watching child pornography is not a crime, risking the normalization of child exploitation.
  • Supreme Court Ruling (Sept 2024): Overturned the Madras ruling, making the downloading/storage of Child Sexual Exploitative and Abuse Material (CSEAM) a crime, placing responsibility on social media intermediaries to comply with Indian law.
  • Reframing the Issue: Changed terminology from “child porn” to “CSEAM,” emphasizing that individuals consuming such content fuel child exploitation, creating a demand-supply chain that perpetuates abuse.

 

Measures Required for Child Safety

  • Comprehensive Framework: The government must implement a holistic framework addressing both offenders and child victims, providing necessary support for rehabilitation.
  • Preventive & Protective Measures: A globally coordinated system is needed to address the evolving nature of child exploitation, including AI-generated content.

 

Steps to Combat CSEAM

  1. Defining Cybercrime: Indian laws should classify CSEAM as cybercrime and an organized economic offense.
  2. Addressing New Crimes: Crimes like online enticement and digital trafficking should be outlawed.
  3. AI-Generated Content: Legal amendments are needed to treat AI-generated child abuse material on par with real child abuse.
  4. Social Media Accountability: Platforms must report CSEAM content in real-time to law enforcement.
  5. Forensic Lab: India should establish a domestic forensic lab to expedite response times in handling CSEAM reports.
  6. Sexual Offender Database: Individuals caught with CSEAM should be entered into the National Database on Sexual Offenders and barred from working with children.

 

The Need for a Borderless Response

  • International Cooperation: CSEAM is a global issue requiring unified international action and a legally binding convention.
  • Global Database: An International Database of Sex Offenders could help track offenders across borders.
  • Financial Institutions: Banks and financial entities must track and disrupt funding supporting child exploitation networks.
  • International Convention: A global, legally binding agreement is crucial for a coordinated response to child exploitation.

 

Conclusion

The Supreme Court ruling offers a landmark opportunity to protect children from exploitation. By implementing these measures, India could set a strong global example in combating child abuse, creating a safer future for vulnerable children.

 

 

 

 

 

Ensuring Social Security for Gig Workers

Context:
Defining the employment relationship in gig work is crucial for ensuring social safety and protection under labour laws.

 

Introduction

  • New law in progress: The Union Ministry of Labour and Employment is drafting a law to integrate gig workers into social security schemes.
  • Aggregator contribution: Aggregators may be required to contribute 1%-2% of their revenue to a social security fund for health insurance and retirement savings.
  • Inclusive definitions: Government is revising definitions of gig and migrant workers for better inclusion.

 

Overview of Proposed Legislation

  • Worker registration: All gig workers must register, and aggregators must provide valid reasons before terminating workers.
  • Dispute resolution: Mechanisms will be introduced to protect gig workers’ rights.
  • Aggregator’s role: Aggregator companies must lead in registering gig workers on the Labour Ministry’s e-Shram portal.
  • e-Shram benefits: Workers registered here are eligible for life and accidental insurance.

 

Labour Codes and Gig Worker

  • New labour codes (2019-2020): Four codes — wage, social security, industrial relations, and occupational safety and health.
  • Inclusion under Social Security Code 2020: Gig workers are classified as a subset of informal workers.
  • Registration on e-Shram: Like informal workers, gig workers must register through self-declaration.

 

Definition of Gig Workers and Employment Relation

  • Issue in definition: Gig workers are placed outside the traditional employer-employee relationship in the Social Security Code 2020.
  • Aggregator strategy: Aggregators often avoid formal employment relations, categorizing workers as independent contractors.
  • Misconception: This leads to a misunderstanding of gig workers’ status, affecting their rights and benefits.

 

Social Security Coverage Gap

  • Differences in entitlement: Formal workers receive 26 weeks of paid maternity leave, while gig workers get minimal cash benefits under social security schemes.
  • Lack of institutional protection: Gig workers don’t receive benefits like minimum wage protection, safety standards, or dispute resolution mechanisms under labour laws.

 

Limitations of Social Security Code 2020

  • Limited social security: Gig workers only get access to specific schemes, not comprehensive institutional protection.
  • Missing safety standards: Occupational safety and health regulations do not cover gig workers.
  • No inclusion under dispute resolution: Gig workers are excluded from the Industrial Relations Code 2020.

 

Need for Clear Employment Relation Definition

  • Core issue: The employment relation for gig workers remains undefined.
  • Aggregator accountability: Aggregators should be recognized as employers to protect gig workers’ rights.
  • International precedent: The 2021 UK Supreme Court ruling on Uber established Uber as an employer, with drivers classified as workers.

 

Way Forward

  • Inclusion under labour codes: Once the employment relation is clearly defined, gig workers can be included under the four existing labour codes.
  • Welfare board model: This has shown limited success with informal workers in the past.
  • Formalisation of gig workers: Defining the employment relationship will promote formalisation and greater worker protection.

 

Conclusion

  • Streamlined labour codes: The focus should be on simplifying and rationalizing labour laws, not creating separate laws for different segments.
  • Key step: Recognizing the employment relationship in gig work is essential for comprehensive worker protection and social security benefits.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *