1824:The 47th Regiment refused to travel to Burma fearing loss of caste due to crossing the sea.
Afghan War:Sepoys forced to eat/drink anything during the war faced social exclusion upon return for violating caste rules.
Conclusion:
Religious and caste concerns, along with economic anxieties, proved more powerful than the prestige of serving the Company, ultimately leading to the Sepoy Mutiny.
Part-3
Sepoy Discontent: Beyond Religion
Religious Issues:
Rumors of forced conversions by Christian missionaries fueled sepoy anxieties.
Open preaching by missionaries in cantonments offended religious sensibilities.
Fears about bone dust in flour and beef/pork fat in Enfield rifle cartridges heightened religious concerns.
Economic Disparity:
Sepoy pay was low (Rs. 7 for infantry, Rs. 27 for cavalry).
Cavalrymen had to bear significant expenses from their pay.
Sepoys felt discriminated against compared to higher-paid British counterparts.
Limited promotion opportunities and racial prejudice added to the discontent.
Social Connection:
Sepoys, as part of the rural population, shared the general resentment towards British rule.
A military officer warned Lord Dalhousie that infringing upon the rights of the people could lead to sepoy disloyalty.
Conclusion:
Sepoy discontent went beyond religious anxieties. Poor pay, discrimination, and a sense of being disconnected from societal concerns fueled their growing resentment against the British.
Part-4
The Sepoy Mutiny: Beyond Military Discontent
Sepoys Connected to Oudh:
Oudh provided a large number of sepoys (75,000).
Sepoys felt the impact of British policies like land revenue changes in Oudh.
Petitions (14,000) from sepoys highlighted hardships faced due to the revenue system.
A Delhi rebel proclamation reflected sepoys’ awareness of the population’s suffering under British rule.
Sepoy Mutiny and Civil Rebellion:
The sepoy revolt triggered a rebellion amongst the civilian population, particularly in North-Western Provinces and Oudh.
Sepoy action emboldened the population, leading to widespread expression of grievances.
Government buildings were attacked, treasuries plundered, and prisons opened.
Social Base of the Rebellion:
The rebellion involved various social groups: landowners, peasants, artisans, religious figures, civil servants, shopkeepers, and boatmen.
The sepoy mutiny snowballed into a popular uprising.
Part-5
British Policies and Discontent
Impact on Peasants:
Excessive taxes led to widespread debt and poverty.
Revenue focus: Maximizing revenue with minimal effort.
Hasty land settlements ignored land resources.
Bareilly (1812): Revenue increased by Rs. 14.73 lakh in short time.
Coercive revenue collection: Torture used to collect taxes (e.g., Rohilkhand: 2.37 lakh coercive actions, 1848-56).
Reluctance to grant remission even in difficult situations.
Impact on Landowners:
Oudh (a center of the Revolt): Taluqdars (landowners) lost power and privileges.
Confiscation of estates left 21,000 taluqdars impoverished and resentful.
Conclusion:
British policies like excessive taxes, harsh revenue collection, and dispossession of landowners created widespread discontent that fueled the Sepoy Mutiny.
Part-6
Broader Discontent with British Rule
Impact on Artisans:
Annexation of Indian states reduced patronage for artisans.
British policy favored British goods, harming Indian handicrafts.
Skilled artisans lost income with no viable alternatives.
Impact on Religion and Culture:
British social reforms (influenced by utilitarianism) were seen as a threat to traditions.
Orthodox Hindus and Muslims feared religious and cultural destruction.
Reform measures were viewed as aiding Christian missionary efforts.
This led to religious opposition to British rule.
Nature of the Rebellion:
Unclear if the Uprising was Planned or Spontaneous:
Lack of evidence from the rebels’ side makes it difficult to say for sure.
Leaders’ actions suggest no major pre-existing plan.
Bahadur Shah (Delhi) and Rani Lakshmibai (Jhansi) initially seemed surprised by the revolt.
Links between Nana Saheb/Maulvi Ahmad Shah and cantonments remain unproven.
The purpose of circulating chapatis and lotus flowers is unclear.
Widespread Uprising: Despite the uncertainty about planning, the revolt became widespread within a month.
Part-7
Organization of the Rebellion
Efforts After Delhi’s Capture:
Letters sent to neighboring rulers seeking support and participation.
Establishment of an administrative court in Delhi (10 members, 6 military, 4 civilian).
Decisions made by majority vote, ruling in the Emperor’s name.
Similar attempts at organization in other centers.
Unifying Figure: Bahadur Shah Zafar
Recognized as Emperor by all rebel leaders.
Coins minted and orders issued in his name.
Khan Bahadur Khan in Bareilly administered under the Mughal Emperor’s name.
Delhi seen as a central point for the rebellion.
Challenges Faced:
Limited resources: Difficulty in acquiring arms and ammunition beyond initial captures.
Inferior weaponry: Facing modern British arms with swords and pikes.
Lack of communication: Inability to coordinate effectively between rebel groups.
Isolated struggles: Each center fighting independently, hindering mutual support.
Impact:
Despite organizational limitations, the rebels fought for over a year against heavy odds.
Part-8
The Sepoy Mutiny: Limited Support and Leadership
Limited Support for the Rebellion:
Merchants, intelligentsia, and some Indian rulers did not join the rebellion.
Some rulers actively supported the British, fearing the Doctrine of Lapse.
Almost half the Indian soldiers remained loyal to the British and fought against the rebels.
The British recaptured Delhi using a force with a significant number of Indian soldiers.
Leadership Issues:
Bahadur Shah Zafar and his wife lacked faith in the sepoys and negotiated with the British.
Many taluqdars (landowners) focused on protecting their own interests, switching sides when convenient.
Lack of a shared vision for the future beyond opposing British rule.
John Lawrence (British official) believed a strong rebel leader could have significantly challenged British rule.
Rebellion Despite Weaknesses:
The rebels displayed courage and commitment to their cause.
Thousands fought and died for their beliefs.
The Fall of the Rebellion
Delhi fell on September 20, 1857, a major blow to the rebellion.
Key rebel figures:
Rani Lakshmibai of Jhansi died fighting in June 1858, earning British respect for her bravery.
Nana Saheb escaped to Nepal in 1859.
Kunwar Singh died in May 1858, a thorn in the British side until his death.
Tantia Tope was captured and executed by the British in April 1859.
Legacy of the Rebellion:
The rebellion, though unsuccessful, challenged British dominance in India.
The sepoys’ act of fighting for freedom is considered a patriotic and progressive step.
The rebellion served as inspiration for future Indian independence movements.
हिन्दी