Chapter- 12 : Rise of Militant Nationalism (1905–1909)
Modern History Notes
Arora IAS Class Notes
Growth of Militant Nationalism:
- Emergence of a radical trend in the 1890s, solidifying by 1905.
- Concurrent rise of a revolutionary wing within the movement.
Factors Contributing to Militant Nationalism:
- Recognition of British Rule’s True Nature:
- Disillusionment with British government’s reluctance to address Indian demands.
- Growing belief in the capacity of an Indian government to lead the nation towards progress.
- Economic hardships of the 1890s exposed exploitative colonial rule.
- Series of Repressive Measures by British Authorities:
- Criticism of Indian Councils Act (1892).
- Deportation of Natu brothers (1897) and imprisonment of Tilak and others on sedition charges.
- Amplification of repressive laws under IPC Sections 124A and 156A.
- Reduction of Indian members in Calcutta Corporation (1899).
- Enactment of Official Secrets Act (1904) and Indian Universities Act.
- Deteriorating Social and Cultural Conditions:
- Suppression of education and cultural identity under British rule.
- New leadership expressed Indian intellectual and moral inspiration.
- Intellectuals like Swami Vivekananda, Bankim Chandra Chatterjee, and Swami Dayananda Saraswati played influential roles.
- Discontent with Achievements of Moderates:
- Dissatisfaction with moderate methods of peaceful and constitutional agitation.
- Critique of “Three ‘P’s”—prayer, petition, and protest—as political mendicancy.
- Reactionary Policies of Lord Curzon:
- Curzon’s disdainful attitude towards Indian nationalism.
- Imposition of administrative measures like the Official Secrets Act and Indian Universities Act.
- Controversial partition of Bengal in 1905, seen as a deliberate attempt to divide and rule.
Emergence of Militant School of Thought:
- A band of nationalist thinkers advocating a more militant approach to political work.
- Key figures included Raj Narain Bose, Aurobindo Ghosh, Bipin Chandra Pal, Bal Gangadhar Tilak, and Lala Lajpat Rai.
- Tilak emerged as a prominent representative, emphasizing self-rule (swaraj) and direct political action.
Basic Tenets of Militant Nationalism:
- Hatred for foreign rule and the belief in Indians’ ability to achieve self-rule.
- Swaraj (self-rule) as the ultimate goal of the national movement.
- Advocacy for direct political action and mass mobilization.
- Emphasis on personal sacrifices for the nationalist cause.
Emergence of a Trained Leadership:
- New leadership capable of channelizing mass energy towards political struggle.
- The movement against the partition of Bengal (1905) provided an outlet for mass participation, particularly through the Swadeshi agitation.
Impact and Legacy:
- Militant nationalism marked a shift towards more aggressive tactics in the Indian freedom struggle.
- The period witnessed increased mass mobilization and political consciousness among Indians.
- Events like the Swadeshi movement and the rise of leaders like Tilak contributed to the growth of nationalist sentiment.
- The era laid the groundwork for future revolutionary movements and the eventual attainment of Indian independence.
The Swadeshi and Boycott Movement
British Motive for Partitioning Bengal (December 1903):
- Divide and weaken Bengal, the center of Indian nationalism.
- Achieve this by:
- Splitting Bengalis based on language: (i) reducing Bengalis to a minority in Bengal (new Bengal with 17 million Bengalis vs 37 million Hindi/Oriya speakers).
- Splitting Bengalis based on religion: (i) creating a Hindu-majority western Bengal (42 million Hindus out of 54 million) and a Muslim-majority eastern Bengal (18 million Muslims out of 31 million).
- Appease Muslims with a new capital (Dacca) to counter the Congress and Indian nationalism.
Anti-Partition Campaign (1903-1905):
- Leaders: Surendranath Banerjea, K.K. Mitra, Prithwishchandra Ray.
- Methods: Petitions, public meetings, memoranda, pamphlets, newspapers (Hitabadi, Sanjibani, Bengalee).
- Goal: Pressure the government to stop the partition through public opinion in India and England.
Swadeshi Movement Launched (August 7, 1905):
- Public meetings erupt in protest after partition announcement (July 1905).
- Boycott of foreign goods pledged in these meetings.
- Formal proclamation at Calcutta Townhall with passage of Boycott Resolution.
- Leaders spread message to boycott Manchester cloth and Liverpool salt.
Day of Mourning (October 16, 1905):
- Observed throughout Bengal on the day partition takes effect.
- Activities: Fasting, bathing in Ganges, processions singing Vande Mataram.
- Rabindranath Tagore composes “Amar Sonar Bangla” (national anthem of Bangladesh).
- People tie rakhis to symbolize unity.
- Large gatherings raise ₹50,000 for the movement.
Spread of the Movement:
- Poona and Bombay: Led by Bal Gangadhar Tilak.
- Punjab: Led by Lala Lajpat Rai and Ajit Singh.
- Delhi: Led by Syed Haider Raza.
- Madras: Led by Chidambaram Pillai.
The Congress Position
- 1905 Congress Meeting (Gokhale President):
- Condemned partition and Curzon’s policies.
- Supported Bengal’s anti-partition and Swadeshi Movement.
- Militant Nationalists (Tilak, Lajpat Rai, Bipin Chandra Pal, Aurobindo Ghosh):
- Wanted movement nationwide and focused on Swaraj (self-rule).
- Moderate-Extremist Dispute:
- Moderates unwilling to go as far as radicals.
- Disagreement over movement’s pace and methods.
- 1906 Congress Meeting (Dadabhai Naoroji President):
- Goal declared as “self-government or Swaraj.”
- 1907 Surat Congress Session:
- Deadlock between Moderates and Extremists.
- Party split, impacting the Swadeshi Movement.
The Movement under Extremist Leadership
Rise of Extremism (After 1905):
- Moderates’ limited success and government repression fueled shift.
Extremist Program:
- Dadabhai Naoroji’s 1906 declaration of Swaraj as the goal emboldened them.
- Called for passive resistance beyond Swadeshi and boycott:
- Boycott government schools/colleges, services, courts, etc.
- Goal: Make British administration “impossible” (Aurobindo Ghosh).
- Transformed movement into a mass struggle for Indian independence.
New Forms of Struggle and Impact:
- Boycott of Foreign Goods:
- Included public burning, refusing rituals with foreign goods, etc.
- Achieved great success at the popular level.
- Public Meetings and Processions:
- Major methods of mass mobilization and expression.
- Corps of Volunteers or ‘Samitis’:
- Groups like Swadesh Bandhab Samiti mobilized masses.
- Provided training, social work, and education.
- Traditional Festivals and Melas:
- Used to spread political messages, like Tilak’s Ganapati festivals.
- Emphasis on Self-Reliance (“Atma Shakti”):
- Rebuilding national dignity and social/economic regeneration.
- Included social reforms against caste oppression, etc.
- National Education Program:
- Boycott of British institutions led to founding national schools.
- Bengal National College and Bengal Technical Institute established.
- Aurobindo Ghosh as first principal of Bengal National College.
- National Council of Education set up for a national education system.
- Satishchandra Mukherjee’s Dawn Society and Bhagabat Chatuspathi promoted self-help in education.
- Boycott of British institutions led to founding national schools.
- Swadeshi Enterprises:
- Established textile mills, soap factories, etc., driven by patriotism.
- O. Chidambaram Pillai’s Swadeshi Steam Navigation Company challenged British dominance.
- Earlier efforts included melas (fairs) exhibiting Indian handicrafts.
- Rabindranath Tagore’s Swadeshi Bhandar (1897) and others.
- Bengal Chemicals factory (1893) and porcelain attempts (1901).
Impact in the Cultural Sphere:
- Nationalist Songs:
- Inspired by Rabindranath Tagore, Rajnikant Sen, and others.
- Tagore’s “Amar Sonar Bangla” became Bangladesh’s national anthem.
- Subramania Bharati’s “Sudesha Geetham” in Tamil Nadu.
- Painting:
- Abanindranath Tagore’s shift to Indian art styles.
- Nandalal Bose, a prominent Indian artist.
- Science:
- Pioneering research by Jagdish Chandra Bose and Prafullachandra Roy.
- Literature:
- “Desher Katha” by Sakharam Ganesh Deuskar inspired activists.
- Promoted swadeshi ideas and criticized colonial rule.
- Became a source for street plays, folk songs, and required reading for activists.
Extent of Mass Participation
Students:
- Active participants in Bengal, Maharashtra (Pune), South India (Guntur, Madras, Salem).
- Organized picketing of shops selling foreign goods.
- Faced repression: disaffiliation of schools, scholarship loss, disciplinary action.
Women:
- Traditionally homebound, but urban middle class women actively participated.
- Joined processions and picketing.
- Significant role in the national movement from then on.
Muslims:
- Limited participation: Barrister Abdul Rasul, Liaqat Hussain, Guznavi, Maulana Azad.
- Most upper and middle class Muslims stayed away or supported partition (Nawab Salimullah).
- Reasons for limited participation:
- All-India Muslim League propped up by British government as an anti-Congress front.
- Movement leaders evoked Hindu festivals and goddesses.
Labour Unrest and Trade Unions:
- Initial strikes: rising prices, racial insults (foreign-owned companies).
- Examples:
- September 1905: Bengali clerks’ strike at Burn Company (Howrah).
- July 1906: East Indian Railway workers’ strike led to union formation.
- 1906-1908: frequent jute mill strikes.
- Strikes in Tuticorin, Tirunelveli (Subramania Siva, Chidambaram Pillai).
- Rawalpindi: arsenal and railway workers’ strike (Lala Lajpat Rai, Ajit Singh).
- Decline by 1908 due to strict government action.
Overall Impact:
- Expanded social base: zamindars, students, women, lower middle class.
- Attempts to address working class grievances through strikes.
- Limited Muslim participation due to divide-and-rule tactics and class-community overlap.
All-India Aspect:
- Movements supporting Bengal and Swadeshi spread across India.
- Tilak: key figure in spreading the movement outside Bengal.
- Saw an opportunity for a united national struggle.
Annulment of Partition (1911)
- Reason: Curb revolutionary terrorism.
- Impact:
- Upset Muslim political elite.
- Delhi became new capital (appease Muslims, but not successful).
- Bengal province reduced (Bihar & Orissa separate, Assam separate).
Evaluation of the Swadeshi Movement
Movement Fizzles Out (By 1908):
- Reasons:
- Severe government repression.
- Lack of effective organization or party structure.
- Leaders arrested/deported, others retiring (Aurobindo Ghosh, Bipin Chandra Pal).
- Internal squabbles (Surat Split, 1907).
- Difficulty sustaining a mass movement’s high pitch.
- Limited reach: upper/middle classes, zamindars, not peasantry.
- Non-cooperation/passive resistance remained ideas.
Turning Point in Modern Indian History:
- Increased participation: students, women, workers, some urban/rural population.
- Birthed major trends of national movement: moderation, extremism, revolution, socialism, etc.
- Impacted art, literature, science, and industry.
- Aroused people, instilled political participation in new forms.
- Undermined colonial ideas and institutions.
- Provided valuable experience for future struggles.
Moderates vs. Extremists:
- Swadeshi Movement exposed limitations of Moderate methods (petitions, speeches).
- Moderates failed to:
- Keep pace with changing times.
- Gain younger generation support.
- Work effectively among the masses.
- Extremist ideology lacked consistency:
- Open members vs. secret sympathizers vs. opponents of violence.
- Differing goals for Swaraj (Tilak vs. Aurobindo).
- Positive aspects of Extremists:
- Emphasis on mass participation and broadening the movement’s social base.
- Elevated patriotism from “academic pastime” to “service and sacrifice.”
- Negative aspects of Extremists:
- Social conservatism and revivalist undertones.
- Hindu nationalism alienated Muslims.
- Promoted unhealthy relationship between politics and religion.
The Surat Split (December 1907)
Context:
- Rise of revolutionary activity.
- Growing differences between Moderates and Extremists.
Run-up to Surat:
- December 1905 (Benaras Session):
- Extremists wanted broader Boycott and Swadeshi Movement.
- Moderates favored limited action.
- Compromise resolution passed, averting a split.
- December 1906 (Calcutta Session):
- Moderates’ enthusiasm waned due to popularity of Extremists and revolutionaries.
- Dadabhai Naoroji elected president.
- “Swaraj” mentioned as Congress goal for the first time.
- Resolution supporting Swadeshi, Boycott, and national education passed.
Deepening Divide:
- Extremists called for wider passive resistance and boycotts.
- Moderates hoped for council reforms and toned down Calcutta program.
- Extremists felt ready for a “big push” for independence.
- Moderates saw council reforms as an opportunity.
- Both sides underestimated the other’s role and overestimated their own strategy.
Split Takes Place:
- Extremists wanted Nagpur session with Tilak/Lajpat Rai as president and reiteration of previous resolutions.
- Moderates wanted Surat session to exclude Tilak and drop those resolutions.
- Rigid positions on both sides led to inevitable split.
- Moderates dominated the remaining Congress, focusing on self-government within the British Empire through constitutional methods.
Government Repression:
- Crackdown on Extremists (1907-1911):
- Seditious Meetings Act (1907)
- Indian Newspapers (Incitement to Offences) Act (1908)
- Criminal Law Amendment Act (1908)
- Indian Press Act (1910)
- Tilak’s trial and imprisonment (1908-1914) for seditious writings.
- Aurobindo, B.C. Pal, and Lajpat Rai sidelined from active politics.
- Weakening of both Extremist and Moderate movements.
Impact:
- Decline in national movement activity until 1914.
- Missed opportunity for a broad-based nationalist movement.
The Government Strategy
Shifting Approach:
- Initial hostility towards all nationalists (including Moderates).
New Strategy (Post-Swadeshi Movement):
- “Rallying them” or “carrot and stick” (John Morley, Secretary of State).
- Three-pronged approach:
- Repression (Mild):Target Extremists to frighten Moderates.
- Conciliation:Offer concessions to Moderates to isolate Extremists.
- Suppression:Suppress Extremists with full force once isolated.
Miscalculation:
- Moderates and Extremists didn’t understand the strategy’s purpose.
- Surat Split: A success for the British government’s strategy.
Morley-Minto Reforms of 1909
Background:
- Muslim Demands:
- Simla Deputation (1906) led by Agha Khan demanded:
- Separate electorates for Muslims.
- Representation exceeding numerical strength.
- Muslim League (1906) aimed at loyalty to British Empire and distancing Muslims from Congress.
- Simla Deputation (1906) led by Agha Khan demanded:
- Congress Demands:
- Gopal Krishna Gokhale met John Morley (Secretary of State for India) to seek self-governing system.
The Reforms:
- Key Players:Lord Minto (Viceroy) and John Morley.
- Measures (Indian Councils Act of 1909):
- Limited elective principle for non-official council members.
- Separate electorates for Muslims in central council (first time).
- Increased number of elected members in central and provincial councils.
- Non-official majority in provincial councils (but some nominated, not elected).
- Indirect elections through electoral colleges.
- More power to legislatures: resolutions, questions, budget discussions (limited).
- One Indian appointed to Viceroy’s Executive Council (Satyendra Sinha, 1st in 1909).
Evaluation:
- Negative Aspects:
- Not a response to Indian political aspirations.
- Self-government (Congress demand) rejected by Morley.
- Aimed to divide nationalists (confuse Moderates, check unity).
- Separate electorates: appeasement of a small Muslim elite, sown seeds of future divisions.
- Indirect elections: “infiltration of legislators through sieves.”
- No true responsibility given to legislatures, led to some irresponsible criticism.
- Limited Positive Aspects:
- Opportunity for debate on issues like education, repression, and labor.
- A small step towards eventual self-governance (unintended consequence?).
Overall:
- Reforms offered “shadow rather than substance.”
- “Benevolent despotism” instead of self-government.
Important Leaders
1.Sri Aurobindo Ghose
Early Life and Education (1872-1892)
- Born: Calcutta, August 15, 1872
- Educated in Christian convent school (Darjeeling) and Cambridge University
- Became proficient in European languages
- Held administrative positions in Baroda and Calcutta
Nationalist Movement (1902-1910)
- Joined Indian freedom struggle (1902)
- Edited nationalist newspaper “Bande Mataram” (1905)
- Imprisoned in Alipore Bomb case (1908)
Spiritual Life (1910-1950)
- Fled to Pondicherry (1910)
- Founded Sri Aurobindo Ashram (1926)
- Developed “integral yoga” philosophy
- Authored spiritual texts like “Bases of Yoga” and “Savitri”
Died: Pondicherry, December 5, 1950
2.Bipin Chandra Pal
Early Life and Education (1858-1898)
- Born: Poil village, Habibganj District (now Bangladesh), November 7, 1858
- Educated at Church Mission Society College, Calcutta
- Worked as librarian
Transformation and Activism
- Inspired by social reformers, joined national movement (1886)
- Advocated for Swaraj (self-rule)
- Joined Lal-Bal-Pal trio with Lala Lajpat Rai and Bal Gangadhar Tilak
- Promoted Swadeshi movement (boycotting British goods)
Contributions
- Participated in Non-cooperation Movement
- Emphasized education and national awareness
- Wrote influential books like “Nationality and Empire” and “The Soul of India”
- Edited national journals like “The Independent” and “The Democrat”
Legacy
- Fought for Indian independence through diverse means
- Remembered for powerful writing and oratory skills
3.Rajnarayan Basu(1826-1899)
- Pioneer of Hindu Nationalism
Social and Religious Context
- British colonization led to spread of Christianity and English education
- Weakened Hindu identity, created a crisis within Brahmo Samaj
Basu’s Response
- Advocated for Hindu reform, not destruction
- Believed Hinduism was the foundation of the nation
- Promoted national consciousness and self-respect
Nationalist Activities
- Delivered influential speech “Hindu Dharmer Shreshthata” (1872)
- Authored pamphlet proposing a “Hindu National Congress” (1885)
- Co-founded “Hindu Mela” to promote national feeling (1867)
Legacy
- Considered “Grandfather of Indian Nationalism” by Jadunath Sarkar
- Influenced figures like Swami Vivekananda and Rabindranath Tagore
- Paved the way for modern Hindu nationalist thought
4.Krishna Kumar Mitra (K.K. Mitra)
- Born: 1852, Baghil village, Mymensingh district (now Bangladesh)
- Son of: Guruprasad Mitra (landholder who opposed British indigo planters)
- Education:
- Mymensingh Hardinge Vernacular School
- Zilla School
- Scottish Church College (Bachelor’s degree, 1876)
- University of Calcutta (Law studies)
5.Prithwishchandra Ray
- Moderate Leader in Anti-Partition Movement (1903-1905)
- Role:Key moderate leader
- Goal:Oppose partition of Bengal
- Strategies:
- Public meetings
- Petitions
- Propaganda (newspapers, pamphlets)