Heatwave Preparedness in India
GS-1 Mains Exam
Short Notes or Revision Notes
Question : Explain the concept of heatwaves and their impact on different regions of India, highlighting the minimum temperature thresholds defined by the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD)
Heatwave Definition (IMD):
- Varies based on region (plains, coast, hills).
- Minimum thresholds:
- Plains: 40°C
- Coast: 37°C
- Hills: 30°C
- Severity based on departure from normal temperature.
Heat Action Plans (HAPs):
- Developed by state/city governments to manage heatwaves.
- Aim to reduce heatwave impact through preparedness, response, and recovery strategies.
- Developed with National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) and IMD.
- At least 23 HAPs exist at state/city level, with some states having district-level plans.
Components of a Typical HAP:
- Heat profile: Past heatwave events, temperature trends, land surface temperature.
- Vulnerability assessment: Identify high-risk regions.
- Response plan:
- Early warning systems for public and authorities.
- Public education campaigns on heatwave risks.
- Setting up heat shelters and cooling centers.
- Providing clean drinking water to prevent dehydration.
- Equipping hospitals with supplies and trained personnel.
- Long-term measures:
- Urban planning with tree plantation.
- Heat-resistant building materials to reduce urban heat island effect.
- Cool roofing technologies to lower indoor temperatures.
Recommendations for Improvement:
- Expand heatwave definition to include humid heat and warmer nights.
- Develop a heat index considering multiple factors beyond temperature.
- Conduct robust climate risk assessments for heatwave likelihood and exposure.
- Create hotspot maps for targeted interventions using geospatial data.
- Allocate dedicated budgets for HAPs.
- Integrate HAPs with broader urban resilience and climate adaptation plans.
Supreme Court Verdict on Climate Change and Great Indian Bustard
GS-2 Mains Exam
Short Notes or Revision Notes
Question : Discuss the significance of the Supreme Court verdict on climate change and its implications for biodiversity conservation, focusing on the case of the Great Indian Bustard
Context:
- Supreme Court recognized the right to be free from adverse climate impacts.
- Judgment focused on Great Indian Bustard conservation vs. renewable energy development.
The Great Indian Bustard:
- Critically endangered bird in Rajasthan and Gujarat.
- Habitat overlaps with areas of high wind and solar energy potential.
- Public interest litigation sought to halt overhead power line construction due to collision risks.
- Supreme Court imposed a blanket ban on new overhead lines and ordered existing lines undergrounded.
Government’s Argument:
- Overhead power lines crucial for meeting renewable energy goals and reducing carbon emissions.
- Undergrounding impractical due to high cost and technical challenges.
- Bustard decline due to factors like poaching, habitat loss, and predation.
Right to be Free from Climate Impacts:
- Recognized by the Court but not binding as it’s not in the operative judgment.
- Seen as a positive step for climate rights discourse.
- Needs further articulation to be fully effective.
Just Transition Framework:
- Alternative approach gaining traction in climate cases worldwide.
- Aims for equitable and inclusive transitions to a low-carbon economy.
- Prioritizes interests of workers, vulnerable communities, and small businesses.
Advantages of Just Transition Framework:
- Avoids presenting climate action and biodiversity protection as opposing forces.
- Promotes inclusive climate action that respects diverse rights and interests.
- Enables more reflexive and inclusive climate rights.
- Can ensure ecological justice by considering non-human nature’s interests.
Way Forward:
- Opportunity to define the content of the right to be free from climate impacts for inclusivity and effectiveness.
- Shared responsibility for shaping this right:
- State
- Activists
- Litigants
- Academics (through participation in recognition, articulation, and enforcement)